5 Questions Every EdTech Company Should Be Able to Answer

image

The “Dear Colleague” Letter Raises the Bar: 5 Questions Every EdTech Company Should Be Able to Answer

Imagine sitting across the table from a school district leadership team.

You've spent months getting to this meeting. Your product solves a real problem. The demonstration went well. The technology is impressive, the implementation plan is ready, and your team knows exactly how to explain every feature.

Then someone on the district side asks a simple question:

"What evidence do you have that this actually improves student outcomes?"

The conversation changes.

The answer can't simply be that students love using it. It can't be the number of logins, minutes spent in the platform, or a list of impressive features. The district wants to know what happens because students and educators use the product.

That kind of conversation isn't hypothetical anymore.

On August 20, 2026, the U.S. Department of Education released a "Dear Colleague" letter addressing the responsible use of education technology in classrooms. At the heart of the guidance is an idea that seems simple: technology used in schools should have a clear instructional purpose, and schools should have evidence that it works.

For those of us who have spent time inside education, it's hard to argue with that.

The EdTech Conversation Has Changed

There was a time when putting technology into classrooms was itself considered progress.

Interactive whiteboards replaced chalkboards. Laptops and tablets became standard equipment. Textbooks moved online. Learning platforms promised personalization, engagement, and access to information that would have been difficult to imagine a generation earlier.

The EdTech industry grew alongside that transformation.

But the conversation happening inside schools today feels different.

District leaders aren't only asking what a product can do.

They're asking why it needs to be there.

They're asking what problem it solves, who should use it, when it should be used, how much time students should spend with it, and what evidence exists that it produces better outcomes.

Those are essentially the questions behind the Department of Education's latest guidance.

And they're questions every company selling into education should be prepared to hear.

Start With the Problem, Not the Product

Think about how most EdTech demonstrations begin.

There's usually a walkthrough of the platform. Features are highlighted. Dashboards appear. Integrations are explained. Maybe AI enters the conversation. The buyer gets a picture of everything the technology is capable of doing.

But imagine beginning somewhere else.

What problem are we trying to solve?

Maybe teachers don't have enough information to identify which students are falling behind.

Maybe a district is struggling with literacy outcomes.

Maybe educators are spending hours on an administrative process that technology could simplify.

Maybe students need access to instruction that the district otherwise couldn't provide.

Once that problem is clear, technology has a reason to enter the story.

Without it, even an impressive product can become another platform competing for a district's time, budget, and attention.

Then Comes a Harder Question: When Should Students Use It?

A teacher has 25 students in a classroom and only so many instructional minutes in a day.

Every minute matters.

If students spend 45 minutes inside a digital platform, that's 45 minutes they aren't spending in a small-group discussion, working directly with their teacher, reading a physical book, collaborating with classmates, or participating in another activity.

That doesn't mean the 45 minutes are wasted.

They may be incredibly valuable.

But the company behind that platform should be able to explain why.

Perhaps 15 minutes using the technology gives the teacher insights that make the next 45 minutes of instruction dramatically more effective.

Perhaps an adaptive program gives a student practice at precisely the level they need.

Perhaps the technology makes something possible that couldn't realistically happen without it.

That's a much stronger story than simply saying students are "engaged."

Not Every Student Needs the Same Thing

The same conversation becomes even more complicated when we ask who should use a product.

A tool that works beautifully for a high school student may make little sense for a first grader.

A platform designed for intervention may not belong in every student's daily routine.

And some of the most valuable education technology may ultimately spend more time in the hands of teachers than students.

That's why specificity matters.

The strongest EdTech companies understand where their products fit, and where they don't.

There's credibility in being able to tell a district, "This is the student we designed this for. This is the moment when it creates the most value. And this is how we know."

Eventually, Every Conversation Comes Back to Evidence

This is where the EdTech sales conversation has perhaps changed the most.

School district buyers have become more knowledgeable and more selective.

They want to know about efficacy.

They want to understand student outcomes.

They want to see the research behind the claims.

And increasingly, salespeople need to be prepared to go well beyond the polished demonstration.

Imagine a curriculum leader asking about the methodology behind an efficacy study.

Or a technology leader asking how student information is being handled.

Or a superintendent wanting to know why a district should dedicate limited instructional time to this particular platform.

The salesperson in the room can't always say, "I'll have our product team get back to you."

At some point, knowing the product deeply becomes part of knowing how to sell it.

That's Where Leadership Enters the Story

This is something we've watched become increasingly important across the education companies we work with at FieldPros.

The best EdTech sales leaders aren't simply great sellers.

They understand the environment their customers operate in.

They know that a superintendent, curriculum director, technology leader, and classroom educator may each evaluate the same product differently.

They know their product well enough to get into the weeds when necessary.

They understand the efficacy studies.

They understand implementation.

They understand the educational problem the company claims to solve.

Most importantly, they expect their teams to develop that same level of knowledge.

Because when a district starts asking harder questions, the company needs people capable of giving better answers.

Maybe That's the Point

It's easy to look at new federal guidance and see another layer of scrutiny for education companies.

But consider the alternative.

Schools purchase a platform because it has a compelling demonstration. Teachers are asked to implement it. Students spend hours using it. The district renews it year after year.

At some point, shouldn't someone ask whether it's working?

As former educators, education professionals, parents, community members, and taxpayers, many of us have a stake in that answer.

Schools have limited dollars and limited instructional time. Companies asking for a share of either should be able to explain what students and educators receive in return.

That doesn't make technology the enemy.

It makes purpose more important.

Five Simple Questions That Tell a Much Bigger Story

Strip away the policy language, and the questions behind the "Dear Colleague" letter are remarkably practical:

  1. What learning problem are we solving?

  2. When should this technology be used?

  3. Who should use it?

  4. How much use is appropriate?

  5. What evidence tells us it's working?

A company that has strong answers to those questions probably has more than a good sales pitch.

It has clarity about its product, its customer, and its place in education.

And when a district leader asks that uncomfortable question across the table—"How do you know this actually works?", the answer shouldn't be difficult to find.

It should already be part of the company's story.

At FieldPros, we work with education companies to find leaders who understand that selling into schools requires more than knowing how to sell. It requires understanding the product, the people it serves, and the education environment in which it has to deliver results.

Looking for leaders who understand education from the inside? Connect with FieldPros to learn more about our recruiting services.

Author List

No items found.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
togle

X

In this article

New Updates

Keep Reading

FieldPros keeps you ahead in EdTech and talent recruitment with insights, trends, and tailored opportunities—whether you're job hunting or seeking top talent. Stay informed, always.

Schedule a Consultation

Ready to discuss your hiring needs or explore our recruitment services and how FieldPros can help? Use our consultation form to schedule a time that works for you. Let’s build the future of education together!

Contact Us Today
schedule-call-imgschedule-call-img
up-arrow